Prove |P(A) X P(B)| = |P(A U B)| For Disjoint Sets

by TheNnagam 51 views

Hey guys, let's dive into a cool problem in elementary set theory: proving that for disjoint sets AA and BB, the cardinality of the Cartesian product of their power sets, ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣|P(A) imes P(B)|, is equal to the cardinality of the power set of their union, ∣P(AextUB)∣|P(A ext{ U } B)|. This might sound a bit technical with all those symbols, but stick with me, and we'll break it down piece by piece. We're going to check a proof and make sure it's solid. Remember, the cardinality of a set, denoted by ∣X∣|X|, is just the number of elements in that set. The power set P(X)P(X) is the set of all possible subsets of XX, including the empty set and XX itself. When AA and BB are disjoint, it means they have no elements in common, i.e., Aext∩B=extβˆ…A ext{ ∩ } B = ext{βˆ…}. This condition is super important and simplifies things quite a bit.

So, the goal is to show that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣|P(A) imes P(B)| = |P(A ext{ U } B)|. Let's recall what the Cartesian product P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B) means. It's the set of all ordered pairs (X,Y)(X, Y) where XX is a subset of AA (i.e., Xext∈P(A)X ext{ ∈ } P(A)) and YY is a subset of BB (i.e., Yext∈P(B)Y ext{ ∈ } P(B)). The cardinality of this set is ∣P(A)∣imes∣P(B)∣|P(A)| imes |P(B)|. Now, what about P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B)? This is the set of all subsets of the union of AA and BB. If AA and BB are disjoint, then the union AextUBA ext{ U } B contains all elements from AA and all elements from BB, with no overlap. The cardinality of P(X)P(X) is 2∣X∣2^{|X|}. So, if ∣A∣=m|A| = m and ∣B∣=n|B| = n, then ∣P(A)∣=2m|P(A)| = 2^m and ∣P(B)∣=2n|P(B)| = 2^n. Since AA and BB are disjoint, ∣AextUB∣=∣A∣+∣B∣=m+n|A ext{ U } B| = |A| + |B| = m + n. Therefore, ∣P(AextUB)∣=2m+n|P(A ext{ U } B)| = 2^{m+n}. Our task is to prove that 2mimes2n=2m+n2^m imes 2^n = 2^{m+n}, which is a fundamental property of exponents and holds true. The challenge here is to demonstrate this equality using set theory concepts, specifically by constructing a bijection (a one-to-one correspondence) between the two sets.

Let's consider the function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB)f: P(A) imes P(B) o P(A ext{ U } B) defined by f(pa,pb)=paextUpbf(p_a, p_b) = p_a ext{ U } p_b, where paext∈P(A)p_a ext{ ∈ } P(A) and pbext∈P(B)p_b ext{ ∈ } P(B). To prove that the cardinalities are equal, we need to show that this function ff is a bijection. A bijection means the function is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto). If we can prove ff is a bijection, then by definition, the two sets must have the same number of elements, i.e., the same cardinality.

Understanding the Function and the Goal

Alright guys, let's get a clearer picture of what we're trying to achieve here. We want to prove that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣|P(A) imes P(B)| = |P(A ext{ U } B)|, given that AA and BB are disjoint sets. Remember, P(A)P(A) is the set of all subsets of AA, and P(B)P(B) is the set of all subsets of BB. The Cartesian product P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B) is the set of all possible pairs (X,Y)(X, Y) where XX is any subset of AA and YY is any subset of BB. The cardinality of P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B) is simply ∣P(A)∣imes∣P(B)∣|P(A)| imes |P(B)|. On the other hand, P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B) is the set of all subsets of the combined set AextUBA ext{ U } B. Since AA and BB are disjoint, their union AextUBA ext{ U } B contains all elements from AA and all elements from BB, without any overlap. The cardinality of P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B) is 2∣AextUB∣2^{|A ext{ U } B|}.

Now, let's think about the function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB)f: P(A) imes P(B) o P(A ext{ U } B) defined by f(pa,pb)=paextUpbf(p_a, p_b) = p_a ext{ U } p_b. Here, pap_a is a subset of AA, and pbp_b is a subset of BB. The function takes such a pair and returns their union. Since paextβŠ†Ap_a ext{ βŠ† } A and pbextβŠ†Bp_b ext{ βŠ† } B, and AA and BB are disjoint, any element in pap_a is not in pbp_b, and vice versa. The union paextUpbp_a ext{ U } p_b is a set containing all elements from pap_a and all elements from pbp_b. Crucially, because AA and BB are disjoint, paextUpbp_a ext{ U } p_b will always be a subset of AextUBA ext{ U } B. Why? Because every element in pap_a is in AA, and every element in pbp_b is in BB, so every element in their union must be in AextUBA ext{ U } B. This confirms that the output of our function ff is indeed an element of P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B).

To prove that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣|P(A) imes P(B)| = |P(A ext{ U } B)|, we need to demonstrate that ff is a bijection. A bijection is a function that is both one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective). If we can show these two properties, it means that every element in P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B) maps to a unique element in P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B), and every element in P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B) is mapped to by exactly one element from P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B). This one-to-one correspondence is the key to proving that the two sets have the same number of elements (cardinality).

Let's get started with checking these properties. It's where the real proof lies, and it requires careful logical steps. We'll examine injectivity first, then surjectivity. If both hold, we've got our proof! This is a classic way to establish equality of cardinalities in set theory, and it's a fundamental concept that pops up in many areas of mathematics. So, let's roll up our sleeves and tackle these proofs. It's going to be awesome!

Proving Injectivity (One-to-One)

Alright team, let's prove that our function f(pa,pb)=paextUpbf(p_a, p_b) = p_a ext{ U } p_b is injective. This means that if we have two different pairs from the domain, say (pa1,pb1)(p_{a1}, p_{b1}) and (pa2,pb2)(p_{a2}, p_{b2}), their images under ff must also be different. Or, more formally, if f(pa1,pb1)=f(pa2,pb2)f(p_{a1}, p_{b1}) = f(p_{a2}, p_{b2}), then it must be the case that (pa1,pb1)=(pa2,pb2)(p_{a1}, p_{b1}) = (p_{a2}, p_{b2}). Let's start with the assumption that f(pa1,pb1)=f(pa2,pb2)f(p_{a1}, p_{b1}) = f(p_{a2}, p_{b2}).

By the definition of ff, this means:

pa1extUpb1=pa2extUpb2p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1} = p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}

Now, we need to show that this equality implies pa1=pa2p_{a1} = p_{a2} AND pb1=pb2p_{b1} = p_{b2}. This is where the condition that AA and BB are disjoint is absolutely crucial. Since Aext∩B=extβˆ…A ext{ ∩ } B = ext{βˆ…}, any element in AA is not in BB, and any element in BB is not in AA.

Let's consider an arbitrary element xx that belongs to pa1p_{a1}. Since pa1extβŠ†Ap_{a1} ext{ βŠ† } A, xx must be an element of AA. Because AA and BB are disjoint, xx cannot be an element of BB.

Now, since xext∈pa1x ext{ ∈ } p_{a1}, it must also be an element of the union pa1extUpb1p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1}. We are given that pa1extUpb1=pa2extUpb2p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1} = p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}. Therefore, xx must also be an element of pa2extUpb2p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}.

Since xext∈Ax ext{ ∈ } A and AA and BB are disjoint, xx cannot come from pb2p_{b2} (because pb2extβŠ†Bp_{b2} ext{ βŠ† } B). This leaves only one possibility: xx must come from pa2p_{a2}. So, we've shown that if xext∈pa1x ext{ ∈ } p_{a1}, then xext∈pa2x ext{ ∈ } p_{a2}. This implies that pa1extβŠ†pa2p_{a1} ext{ βŠ† } p_{a2}.

We can perform a symmetric argument. Let yy be an arbitrary element of pa2p_{a2}. Since pa2extβŠ†Ap_{a2} ext{ βŠ† } A, yext∈Ay ext{ ∈ } A. Because AA and BB are disjoint, yy cannot be in BB. Since yext∈pa2y ext{ ∈ } p_{a2}, it must be in pa2extUpb2p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}. As pa2extUpb2=pa1extUpb1p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2} = p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1}, yy must be in pa1extUpb1p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1}. Since yext∈Ay ext{ ∈ } A and AA and BB are disjoint, yy cannot come from pb1p_{b1} (because pb1extβŠ†Bp_{b1} ext{ βŠ† } B). Therefore, yy must come from pa1p_{a1}. This implies pa2extβŠ†pa1p_{a2} ext{ βŠ† } p_{a1}.

Combining both results (pa1extβŠ†pa2p_{a1} ext{ βŠ† } p_{a2} and pa2extβŠ†pa1p_{a2} ext{ βŠ† } p_{a1}), we conclude that $ extbf{p_{a1} = p_{a2}}$.

Now, let's do the same for the subsets of BB. Consider an arbitrary element zz that belongs to pb1p_{b1}. Since pb1extβŠ†Bp_{b1} ext{ βŠ† } B, zz must be an element of BB. Because AA and BB are disjoint, zz cannot be an element of AA.

Since zext∈pb1z ext{ ∈ } p_{b1}, it must also be an element of the union pa1extUpb1p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1}. We know pa1extUpb1=pa2extUpb2p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1} = p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}. Therefore, zz must also be an element of pa2extUpb2p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}.

Because zext∈Bz ext{ ∈ } B and AA and BB are disjoint, zz cannot come from pa2p_{a2} (since pa2extβŠ†Ap_{a2} ext{ βŠ† } A). This leaves only one possibility: zz must come from pb2p_{b2}. So, we've shown that if zext∈pb1z ext{ ∈ } p_{b1}, then zext∈pb2z ext{ ∈ } p_{b2}. This implies that pb1extβŠ†pb2p_{b1} ext{ βŠ† } p_{b2}.

Similarly, let ww be an arbitrary element of pb2p_{b2}. Since pb2extβŠ†Bp_{b2} ext{ βŠ† } B, wext∈Bw ext{ ∈ } B. Because AA and BB are disjoint, ww cannot be in AA. Since wext∈pb2w ext{ ∈ } p_{b2}, it must be in pa2extUpb2p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2}. As pa2extUpb2=pa1extUpb1p_{a2} ext{ U } p_{b2} = p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1}, ww must be in pa1extUpb1p_{a1} ext{ U } p_{b1}. Since wext∈Bw ext{ ∈ } B and AA and BB are disjoint, ww cannot come from pa1p_{a1} (since pa1extβŠ†Ap_{a1} ext{ βŠ† } A). Therefore, ww must come from pb1p_{b1}. This implies pb2extβŠ†pb1p_{b2} ext{ βŠ† } p_{b1}.

Combining these results (pb1extβŠ†pb2p_{b1} ext{ βŠ† } p_{b2} and pb2extβŠ†pb1p_{b2} ext{ βŠ† } p_{b1}), we conclude that $ extbf{p_{b1} = p_{b2}}$.

Since we have shown that pa1=pa2p_{a1} = p_{a2} and pb1=pb2p_{b1} = p_{b2}, it follows that (pa1,pb1)=(pa2,pb2)(p_{a1}, p_{b1}) = (p_{a2}, p_{b2}). This completes the proof of injectivity. Our function ff maps distinct pairs to distinct pairs, which is exactly what we needed!

Proving Surjectivity (Onto)

Now, let's tackle the second part: proving that our function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB)f: P(A) imes P(B) o P(A ext{ U } B) defined by f(pa,pb)=paextUpbf(p_a, p_b) = p_a ext{ U } p_b is surjective. For ff to be surjective, it means that for every element in the codomain, P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B), there must be at least one element in the domain, P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B), that maps to it. In simpler terms, any subset of AextUBA ext{ U } B can be formed by taking the union of some subset of AA and some subset of BB. Let's grab an arbitrary element SS from the codomain, P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B). This means SS is a subset of AextUBA ext{ U } B, so SextβŠ†AextUBS ext{ βŠ† } A ext{ U } B. Our goal is to find a pair (pa,pb)(p_a, p_b) where paext∈P(A)p_a ext{ ∈ } P(A) and pbext∈P(B)p_b ext{ ∈ } P(B) such that f(pa,pb)=Sf(p_a, p_b) = S, which means paextUpb=Sp_a ext{ U } p_b = S.

Since SextβŠ†AextUBS ext{ βŠ† } A ext{ U } B, we can split SS into two parts: the elements of SS that are also in AA, and the elements of SS that are also in BB. Let's define:

pa=Sext∩Ap_a = S ext{ ∩ } A pb=Sext∩Bp_b = S ext{ ∩ } B

Now, we need to verify a few things about these newly defined sets pap_a and pbp_b. First, are they indeed elements of the domain sets? That is, is paext∈P(A)p_a ext{ ∈ } P(A) and pbext∈P(B)p_b ext{ ∈ } P(B)?

Since pa=Sext∩Ap_a = S ext{ ∩ } A, and SextβŠ†AextUBS ext{ βŠ† } A ext{ U } B, any element in pap_a must be in both SS and AA. If an element is in AA, it's certainly a subset of AA. So, paextβŠ†Ap_a ext{ βŠ† } A. This means $ extbf{p_a ∈ P(A)}$.

Similarly, since pb=Sext∩Bp_b = S ext{ ∩ } B, any element in pbp_b must be in both SS and BB. If an element is in BB, it's certainly a subset of BB. So, pbextβŠ†Bp_b ext{ βŠ† } B. This means $ extbf{p_b ∈ P(B)}$.

Great! We've found a pair (pa,pb)(p_a, p_b) from the domain P(A)imesP(B)P(A) imes P(B). Now, we need to check if their union is equal to our arbitrary set SS. That is, does paextUpb=Sp_a ext{ U } p_b = S?

Let's consider the union paextUpb=(Sext∩A)extU(Sext∩B)p_a ext{ U } p_b = (S ext{ ∩ } A) ext{ U } (S ext{ ∩ } B).

We know that for any sets X,Y,ZX, Y, Z, the distributive property of intersection over union holds: Xext∩(YextUZ)=(Xext∩Y)extU(Xext∩Z)X ext{ ∩ } (Y ext{ U } Z) = (X ext{ ∩ } Y) ext{ U } (X ext{ ∩ } Z). A similar distributive property holds for union over intersection, but it's not directly applicable here. However, we can use the property that for any sets S,A,BS, A, B, (Sext∩A)extU(Sext∩B)=Sext∩(AextUB)(S ext{ ∩ } A) ext{ U } (S ext{ ∩ } B) = S ext{ ∩ } (A ext{ U } B).

So, paextUpb=Sext∩(AextUB)p_a ext{ U } p_b = S ext{ ∩ } (A ext{ U } B).

Since SS is an element of P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B), we know that SextβŠ†AextUBS ext{ βŠ† } A ext{ U } B. When a set SS is a subset of another set UU, the intersection Sext∩US ext{ ∩ } U is simply SS. In our case, SextβŠ†AextUBS ext{ βŠ† } A ext{ U } B, so Sext∩(AextUB)=SS ext{ ∩ } (A ext{ U } B) = S.

Therefore, we have shown that $ extbf{p_a ext{ U } p_b = S}$.

This means that for any subset SS in P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B), we have found a pair (pa,pb)ext∈P(A)imesP(B)(p_a, p_b) ext{ ∈ } P(A) imes P(B) such that f(pa,pb)=Sf(p_a, p_b) = S. This is precisely the definition of surjectivity. We've successfully shown that our function ff is surjective!

Conclusion: A Bijection is Born!

So, what does this all mean, guys? We started with the goal of proving that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣|P(A) imes P(B)| = |P(A ext{ U } B)| for disjoint sets AA and BB. We defined a function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB)f: P(A) imes P(B) o P(A ext{ U } B) by f(pa,pb)=paextUpbf(p_a, p_b) = p_a ext{ U } p_b. We then meticulously proved two crucial properties about this function:

  1. Injectivity (One-to-One): We showed that if f(pa1,pb1)=f(pa2,pb2)f(p_{a1}, p_{b1}) = f(p_{a2}, p_{b2}), then it must follow that pa1=pa2p_{a1} = p_{a2} and pb1=pb2p_{b1} = p_{b2}. This ensures that each distinct pair in the domain maps to a distinct subset in the codomain.
  2. Surjectivity (Onto): We showed that for any subset SS in P(AextUB)P(A ext{ U } B), we can find specific subsets paext∈P(A)p_a ext{ ∈ } P(A) and pbext∈P(B)p_b ext{ ∈ } P(B) (namely, pa=Sext∩Ap_a = S ext{ ∩ } A and pb=Sext∩Bp_b = S ext{ ∩ } B) such that their union paextUpbp_a ext{ U } p_b equals SS. This confirms that every possible subset of AextUBA ext{ U } B is